The first Bank Secrecy Act was passed in the Caribbean in the Bahamas in 1964. Until then, Switzerland had always "been renowned banking haven" - known worldwide for its "private banking". The Cayman Islands Government was soon followed by the Bahamas Bank Secrecy Act, and later with almost identical legislation a year. The growth of the Cayman Islands to the Top offshore banking center was initially spurred on by their secrecy Act.
Today, allTax havens, secrecy or confidentiality are orders. An exception is Bermuda, which never officially adopted a secrecy - like Bermuda "common law" in isolation "jurisdiction" there had already served always good.
It turned out that the secrecy / confidentiality laws and regulations in a push to offshore companies for the Caribbean and Pacific tax havens, and for the most part, they were still.
While the original idea of banking secrecy was a good year for theOffshore havens, it was not (and will never) be well received by the U.S. Treasury Department and its enforcement agency - the IRS.
While no one would argue that these countries have every right to adopt and strengthen their banking secrecy, it has caused problems, including the procurement of a criminal element, drug issues of money laundering, tax evasion and issues for the citizens of developed nations like the United States, United Kingdom , Canada and Australia.
Bank secrecy has been working alone for the end userFor over forty years, but under U.S. law (and the laws of other industrialized nations - Japan, Britain, Canada, Australia), tax evasion (a crime), only in an offshore account and not reporting the income on one of the tax return. In the U.S., the mere existence of the bank and security accounts are reportable on a Form TD from 90 to 22.1.
Few Americans want to report.
http://www.ustax.ch/pdf/2005_f9022-1.pdf
But secrecy and confidentiality regulations provide protectionto creditors and "other", and where the taxes alone are not the problem, the bank secrecy with "competence" add up to "Asset Protection", privacy, and more.
Privacy: An author writes: "People do not, your offshore assets." Bank secrecy laws in the Bahamas (Cayman, Anguilla and the BVI) are impenetrable said.
Exception: All these countries have legal assistance treaties with the United States and other nations that allowfor cooperation in criminal matters (other than fiscal aspects).
A crime such as embezzlement of assets from the funds of the U.S. company, "hidden bank accounts offshore will end in conviction and sentencing - the most time.
The office MLAT are applicable to the "Bund" by the U.S. Attorney 's (ie, LA is located in Miami, Atlanta, New York,). However, there is no "collaboration" available to privateInvestigations under the MLAT-except by the use of local (Bahamas, Anguillian, Cayman) lawyers and the local courts of the countries. If such "investigations are pursued, they are often expensive and useless - as the tax havens have a reputation to protect, and here - that banking secrecy is a problem in the courts.
U.S. offshore judgments are not recognized: "The Supreme Court of the Bahamas does not recognize U.S. court judgmentsagainst a company incorporated in their jurisdiction. "The same is true of the other Caribbean ports - including the Cayman, the British Virgin Islands, Anguilla, Nevis and St. Kitts to be said.
Federal courts no jurisdiction: "U.S. Federal Court judges have no power or authority outside the borders of the United States. IRS liens are not recognized. Seizure warrants offshore from the U.S. Customs Service is not offshore." Recognized - in fact, is the author of this textto correct.
Another interesting find protection from the coast, American and foreign lawyers can not exercise rights in these places. For example, here in the Bahamas, you have to the courts to be a citizen of the Bahamas Bahamas to become a lawyer and practice in the. Even the largest American firm would have a Bahamian law firm litigation or their claim to hire claim
Despite all of the above, there is no "integration" between U.S. tax law and the law of theany foreign nation - except where there is an "income tax treaty.
But the U.S. Treasury has a sympathetic "ear" and attitude to the offshore financial centers, community well-being had, but even that of "threats" has many "bullying" to acceptance to stand for their rights and impose no taxes.
Use of tax havens by citizens from all industrial nation will always honor their risks and opportunities. Know your own countryTax laws are of fundamental importance. An offshore company or bank - no matter how big and serious - just not interested in your tax liability or problem.
The irony in all this is that the U.S. Tax Code and the Canadian Tax Code and the United Kingdom have tax relief provisions favorable to business. Not all outgoing and incoming transactions are "outlaws" or illegal.
With a tax code that is 55,000 pages long, the U.S. law on the use of tax havens and offshore bankingAccounts is certainly not recommended.
http://www.fourmilab.ch/ustax/ustax.html
http://www.fourmilab.ch/ustax/www/sections.html
Keep reading the U.S. Tax Code is long enough and you will find some "green lights and loopholes." For example, offshore real estate have an offshore company and trust may "Shelter" rental income and capital gains from U.S. taxes when you "structure" your affairs and know the U.S. Tax Code (in particular the law and CFCrevocable trust domestic U.S. legislation - section 661 to 679th sections
See especially "Power of withdrawal".
http://www.fourmilab.ch/ustax/www/t26-A-1-JIE-676.html
http://www.fourmilab.ch/ustax/www/t26-A-1-JIE-674.html.
There is a Foreign Earned Income Exclusion of $ 80,000 as a reward, you can exclude, and the U.S. payer of your salary can still use the deduction for its tax return, if you know this,Law.
[Http: / / www.irs.gov/businesses/small/international/article/0] = 97130.00 id. Html
But in general, which is wishful thinking, most tree-lined avenues, Americans, Canadians and UK citizens to follow, so be careful.
1200000000000 • $ dollar balances on Cayman Banks - up to 10% in 2005 says Cayman Government?
• Sixty percent of this money comes from U.S. investors, said Manhattan District Attorney Robert Morgenthau.
• Did you know there are two online brokersBusiness in a tax haven no (offshore) is - and both are 100% by the Bank of New York heard?
• Did you know that non-resident aliens (including foreign companies) can trade "publicly traded shares" (ie, NYSE, NASDAQ, AMEX) under the Tax Code and not owe capital gains tax?
• "One of the most effective applications of offshore trusts is in combination with a property company with limited liability." - Richard Graham-Taylor, partner Ernst & Young, Grand Cayman (January1990).
• 2005 income for Ernst & Young worldwide were 19 billion U.S. dollars.
• The Old Moneyed Dupont Nemours and Roosevelt Families Buy a tax haven
• http://tomazz1.wordpress.com/
• [http://www.ncpa.org/abo/staff/pdupont.html]
• http://www.guerrillanews.com/blogs/1839/The_history_of_the_Du_Pont_weapons_industrial_complex
Disclaimer: Pursuant to Internal Revenue Service will advise advice, that any federal tax advice in thisCommunication, including any attachments or enclosures, was not intended or written to be, and it can not be used, by any person or entity for the purpose of avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code introduced.
No comments:
Post a Comment